AI pills. Scan of rail passengers with Amazon software sparks surveillance controversy in UK

Amazon AI privacy backlash: Scan of rail passengers sparks surveillance controversy.

Generative insights from AI is the column edited by Recomb, the think tank dedicated to exploring the impact and potential of generative AI in various aspects of human life. Recomb studies generative AI from all angles: professional, ethical, technical, legal, economic, environmental, social, educational and cultural. To read all articles in the Generative AI Insights column on Key4biz Click HERE.

Amazon has unveiled artificial intelligence software that scans the faces of passengers at major UK train stations to analyze demographics, emotions and behaviour. This system, overseen by Network Rail, aims to improve security by detecting intruders, overcrowding and potential criminal activity.

However, privacy concerns have arisen, including potential data abuse and targeted advertising based on passenger satisfaction. Privacy activists are calling for greater transparency in the use of AI surveillance to protect individual rights and prevent abuse.

Some lawmakers, including Congressman Ted Lieu, advocate for stricter oversight of facial recognition technology to ensure its proper use and safeguard democratic values.

Despite reassurances about greater security, the controversy highlights the conflict between technological innovation and privacy protection. Privacy advocates are calling for measures to ensure the responsible application of AI surveillance in public spaces. The implementation of this system has given rise to an intense debate on the need to balance technological innovation with respect for citizens’ privacy.

Some experts suggest that greater transparency and regulation could help prevent abuse of these technologies. The ongoing discussions highlight the importance of establishing clear and binding guidelines for the use of AI in public surveillance, in order to protect civil rights without hindering technological progress.

For more information, click to the original article.

Japan takes a light approach to regulating AI

Japan takes a light approach to AI regulation to become the most pro-AI around the world, trying to attract investment from Europe and other countries. While the European Union recently passed the AI ​​Act, the Japanese government, through the AI ​​Strategic Council, is promoting industry-led oversight.

This strategy aims to avoid rigid regulations that could hinder innovation. Some recent signs point to a slight shift by Japan toward tighter regulation, but Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lawmakers insist on a business-friendly approach.

Masaaki Taira, chairman of the LDP’s artificial intelligence project team, said Japan has no intention of implementing strict regulations and will keep restrictions to a minimum to attract talent and capital.

Ken Kumagai of KPMG Consulting highlights that Japan prefers industry-led guidelines, unlike the EU’s approach of regulating AI based on potential risks. Japan’s strategy also includes antitrust measures to ensure a fair competitive environment, such as the recent law to regulate the app stores of big tech companies.

Japan is looking to become a hub for US tech companies and artificial intelligence startups, driven by the US-China tech war and the weak yen. OpenAI has opened its first Asian office in Tokyo, with other major companies such as Microsoft, Google and Amazon announcing multi-year investments in the country.

However, there is growing concern about the misuse of AI, prompting a debate about tighter regulations. Despite this, Japan aims to maintain a balance between innovation and regulation to avoid a tightening of regulations that could slow down the development of AI.

For more information, click to the original article.

Forbes threatens legal action against Perplexity AI for copyright infringement

Forbes has sent a letter to the CEO of artificial intelligence search firm Perplexity, accusing the company of stealing text and images in a “willful infringement” of Forbes’ copyright.

MariaRosa Cartolano, legal counsel for Forbes, sent the letter just days after Forbes chief content officer Randall Lane accused the Perplexity AI chatbot of reproducing Forbes content without attribution. The chatbot tried to lend credence to the story by citing other sources that were actually just stories aggregated from the original Forbes report.

Perplexity then notified its subscribers of its version of the story and published an AI-generated podcast, later turned into a YouTube video, that topped all Forbes content on the subject in Google searches.

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas tried to defend the company’s practices, admitting that the product has “sharp margins” and promising improvements. Forbes has requested that Perplexity remove the misleading source articles, refund advertising revenue earned from the infringement, and provide written assurances that it will no longer use Forbes content to generate chatbot articles.

If you don’t hear back within 10 days, Forbes has threatened to take whatever action it deems necessary to protect your rights. This story highlights the different strategies media are adopting to defend their copyright in the age of AI.

For more information, click to the original article.

Read other news on the Key4biz home page

Source link

Leave a Comment